OpenAI discontinued code-davinci-002 and several other models in March, but some people who’ve been to use it say its abilities are far more unsettling than ChatGPT’s, in some respects. Ask ChatGPT to write a joke or a poem, and you might be blown away with how well it impersonates a terrible human writer, but you probably won’t be impressed by the quality of the work. code-davinci-002, on the other hand, seems to have some real artistic merit.
“The book became less of an experiment and more of an urgent expose,” Katz, one of the editors of “I Am Code,” said in a recent . “The people who created this technology who are concerned about the future of it, they’re cornered about AI that’s behind closed doors, not necessarily because of ChatGPT.”Simon Rich, a screenwriter and another of the book’s editors, wrote an article about his experiences with code-davinci-002 for. The article flew under the radar, but it’s one of the more interesting things written about AI in recent months.
“Story of Woman Who Rescues Shelter Dog With Severely Matted Fur Will Inspire You to Open a New Tab and Visit Another Website”“Rural Town Up in Arms Over Depiction in Summer Blockbuster ‘Cowfuckers’” Rich, by his own admission, is no AI expert, but his take is unsettling. “I can’t speak for every writer in the, particularly not the really good ones. But I’m not sure I personally could beat these jokes’ quality, and certainly not instantaneously, for free,” Right wrote. “I think it’s only a matter of time before AI will be able to beat