ON MAY 14th, San Francisco’s legislature voted to ban city agencies from using facial-recognition technology. Leading the charge was Aaron Peskin, a member of the city's Board of Supervisors, the legislative body. In January, when he introduced the measure, he said he had “yet to be persuaded that there is any beneficial use of this technology that outweighs the potential for government actors to use it for coercive and oppressive ends.” That argument proved compelling.
Some may shrug, believing that since their phones already track them, and their social-media accounts provide a record of their preferences, travel, and in many cases political beliefs, one more incursion on their privacy does not amount to much. But facial-recognition technology is rather different. A person can choose to leave their phone at home, or delete their social-media accounts. To avoid being tracked in a city blanketed with facial-recognition cameras, they would have to stay home.
America is not yet at that point. Facial-recognition is not currently widely used. It is reported not to work especially well in non-controlled settings—it cannot always compare and identify people at odd angles, in motion and under bad lighting. It grows less accurate as a database gets larger, and it is especially bad at accurately identifying non-white people. But it is getting better and more popular.
it will also prevent useful things like finding dangerous criminals. Like Boston marathon bombers
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Technology Technology Latest News, Technology Technology Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
San Francisco just banned facial-recognition technologySan Francisco, long one of the most tech-friendly and tech-savvy cities in the world, is now the first in the US to prohibit its government from using facial-recognition technology. Didn't want to be caught, illegal aliens Thank you, ShahidForChange! Dont need that kind of fascism
Source: cnnbrk - 🏆 393. / 55 Read more »
San Francisco becomes first city in U.S. to ban facial-recognition softwareThe ban dealt a swift symbolic blow to a key technology rapidly being deployed by law-enforcement agencies nationwide. Weird flex Silicon Valley, but ok. Crime must be allowed to flourish for the State to have power.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
San Francisco may ban police, city use of facial recognitionSan Francisco is on track to become the first U.S. city to ban the use of facial recognition by police and other city agencies as the technology creeps into daily life I boarded a flight last month and didn’t even need a boarding pass because they just use facial recognition. Almost the entire plane was already in the system. Crazy stuff. ProCriminals Good
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
San Francisco bans police use of face recognition technologySan Francisco supervisors ban the use of facial recognition software by police and other city departments, becoming the first U.S. city to outlaw the technology Might as well ban all tech as evil. Good. This is a gross misuse of power and violation of the rights of citizens. 'But we can still use it, right?' - Facebook, Google, Amazon, Apple, etc.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
San Francisco could be first US city to ban facial-recognition technologySan Francisco, long one of the most tech-friendly and tech-savvy cities in the world, is poised to prohibit its government from using facial-recognition technology. MagSwag73 and at Laurie 😂😂 Brilliant! When we thought San Fransisco leaders couldn’t have been dumber, they exceed our expectations. Good
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
San Francisco may ban use of facial recognition by police and citySan Francisco is on track to become the first U.S. city to ban the use of facial recognition by police and other city agencies, reflecting a growing backlash against a technology that's creeping into airports, stores, home security cameras and more. hey ferenstein can we resume our chat about how tech doesn't ruin SF? San Francisco is on track to become the first U.S. city to ban the use of facial recognition by police and other city agencies, reflecting a growing backlash against a technology that's been leaping into airports, stores, home security cameras and more for years. Typically leftist city.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Expert: San Francisco face ID ban would be warning to policeSan Francisco is on track to become the first U.S. city to ban the use of facial recognition by police and other city agencies. finally San Francisco can poop in the streets in peace Yet they have no problem kicking in a reporters door and violating his first amendment rights. Seems like odd policy outcomes. Not that this is the tipping point, but I wonder just how off the map Cali will be in the next decade.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
San Francisco votes to ban city use of facial recognition technologySan Francisco officials on Tuesday voted 8 to 1 to ban the purchase and use of f... TV Limiting technical constraints Working in maximizing the team's sail and joining with engineering engineering. Working the working range for periodic documentation Guidance and control of working forces working on organizing and maximizing the leadership courses of the project TV Discontent? Why TV big mistake!
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
San Francisco Bans Facial Recognition TechnologyThe law would affect police — but not airports or private businesses. now whats the point of police if they cant even identity the person then? dumbest law ever now that's chill How stupid and selfish! So sick of the civil rights and privacy garbage taking precedence over public safety. I could care less if it gets a felon off the streets or finds somebody's missing loved one!
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »