AI firms mustn’t govern themselves, say ex-members of OpenAI’s board

  • 📰 TheEconomist
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 23 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 12%
  • Publisher: 92%

Technology Technology Headlines News

Technology Technology Latest News,Technology Technology Headlines

For humanity’s sake, regulation is needed to tame market forces, argue Helen Toner and Tasha McCauley

companies pushing forward the frontier of a revolutionary new technology be expected to operate in the interests of both their shareholders and the wider world? When we were recruited to the board of OpenAI—Tasha in 2018 and Helen in 2021—we were cautiously optimistic that the company’s innovative approach to self-governance could offer a blueprint for responsible’s enormous potential for both positive and negative impact, it’s not sufficient to assume that such incentives will always be...

For the rise ofOpenAIsystems that are generally smarter than humans—would benefit “all of humanity”. Later, a for-profit subsidiary was created to raise the necessary capital, but the non-profit stayed in charge. The stated purpose of thiswas to protect the company’s ability to stick to its original mission, and the board’s mandate was to uphold that mission. It was unprecedented, but it seemed worth trying. Unfortunately it didn’t work.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 6. in TECHNOLOGY

Technology Technology Latest News, Technology Technology Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Two former OpenAI board members say AI firms can’t be left to govern themselvesFor humanity’s sake, regulation is needed to tame market forces, argue Helen Toner and Tasha McCauley
Source: TheEconomist - 🏆 6. / 92 Read more »