, and this person wrongly assumed my post's point was to make a legal argument. The more I tried to explain I wasn't taking a prescriptive position on the topic, the more they insisted my prescriptive position was wrong. They even screenshotted my post and made their own snarky post—without tagging me.
Am I alone? When was the last time a mainstream social media platform felt good, healthy or fulfilling? When was the last time it moved the discourse forward in a positive way?for"social," including"being characterized by friendly companionship or relations" and"seeking or enjoying the companionship of others." One definition specifies the context of digital social networks that"promote companionship or communication with friends and other personal contacts.
Beneath this thin veneer sits a powerful ad platform with a simple formula—more engagement means more eyes means more valuable ad sales. The algorithms are designed to serve the bottom line, users be damned.to its corporate code of conduct. Google's search product was gaining big momentum. The team knew it would face pressure to essentially prioritize monetary opportunities over its users' experience and well-being.
In reality, I believe the wide latitude these creeds grant gives Big Tech a license to do whatever it wants and eschew accountability. Ambiguity always gives someone an advantage. For example, OpenAI is, but there's no concrete vision for what constitutes AGI. This benefits Microsoft, as Microsoft can only license the use of OpenAI products thatTechnologists love to claim a stance of neutrality in developing products and platforms.