"It's infuriating that Red Ventures' decisions have undermined the quality work done by CNET's writers, editors and producers.
"Let's take a step back and consider what we've witnessed here," a Wikipedia editor who goes by the name "bloodofox" chimed in.
evidently implemented these tools and approaches throughout their portfolio but won't say exactly where or how.
Some editors quickly took Chess' side. As one cosigner, an editor who goes by "The Kip," wrote a few hours later: "Between the AI-generated and often blatantly inaccurate content, as well as the SEO/sales/marketing-oriented output, and the decisions previously made regarding"It's high time for it. Enough is enough," a familiar voice, bloodofox, concurred, adding that "if it's owned by Red Ventures, we need to go ahead and identify it as a hard fail.