in London reminded me of the 1964 movie—a favorite of mine—and made me ponder: Are we nearing the point of no return in the way we develop and use artificial intelligence ? Are the somewhat apocalyptic prophecies and warnings—some made by industry leaders— something we should take into account? Should we use AI more or hold back and reassess the potential risks versus the benefits?. In the 1960s and 1970s, the focus on AI was on building expert systems, mostly using overwhelming sets of rules.
In the last few years, the research around AI has exploded. The introduction of human-like assistance that started with voice agents like Siri and Alexa paved the way and readied the public for the introduction of ChatGPT.have tried and experienced AI themselves by using ChatGPT, and that doesn't even include other AI-enabled technologies such as DALL-E and autonomous cars. The more glimpses the public has of AI, the bigger their demand.
The intellectual property world has been in an interesting debate in the last few years about whether AI can be considered an inventor. Can an AI system actually create and generate something completely novel that's worth patenting?. In patent applications filed by Thaler, he credited DABUS as the inventor. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office rejected this application for the lack of a valid inventor.
Will humankind remain in control over AI or will the machines rise to think for themselves? I asked GPT-4 that question and was given the following answer:"AI machines are not capable of thinking independently in the same way as humans. They cannot have original thoughts or creative ideas outside their pre-programmed capabilities. It's important to note that while AI can mimic human-like decision-making and creative processes, it doesn't truly understand these concepts as humans do.
Technology Technology Latest News, Technology Technology Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: futurism - 🏆 85. / 68 Read more »
Source: IntEngineering - 🏆 287. / 63 Read more »