Fox News medical contributor Dr. Marc Siegel discusses ChatGPT's accuracy in making medical decisions on 'The Big Money Show.', including identifying possible diagnoses and final care decisions.Some critics argue that artificial intelligence studies aren't grounded in real clinical needs, but not Dr. Marc Siegel. The New York University professor of medicine joined "The Big Money Show" to bolster his support for A.I.
Fox News contributor Dr. Marc Siegel joined"The Big Money Show" to give his take on artificial intelligence and it's divisive impact on the medical community. "I actually like it, and I think overall the balance is in favor of it. And I'll tell you why," Siegel teased. "This study is from the Journal of Internet Medical Research, and they look at the Merck manual and 36 scenarios from Merck, and they look at it from beginning to end. What could this be? What is it? What do we do? What's the final diagnosis in there? The more complicated it was, the less well ChatGPT did. It's somewhere between 60 percent and 72 percent.
On the other hand, researchers were also able to pinpoint ChatGPT's greatest weakness – making deferential diagnoses. In this category, the chatbot was only 60 percent accurate. When it came to making clinical management decisions, such as figuring out what medications to treat a patient with after the correct diagnosis, it was only about 68 percent accurate.
Technology Technology Latest News, Technology Technology Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: HuffPostWomen - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »