CNET is reviewing its AI-written articles after being notified of serious errors | Engadget

that the publication had put out around 75 articles about basic financial topics since November last year. Guglielmo said the website decided to do an experiment to see if AI can truly be used in newsrooms and other information-based services in the coming months and years. Based on

report, it looks like the answer is: Sure, but the pieces it generates need to thoroughly fact-checked by a human editor. combed through one of the articles Guglielmo highlighted in the post, namely the piece entitled"What Is Compound Interest?", and found a handful of serious errors.

Maybe they could just not write articles with AI

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. cabeGOD We warned you that we would replace you with a small shell script. Articles, Art, Nothing is safe...

We are tired of dealing with clint support bots to now having to read articles written by them. AI is not meant to be the solution for every question, or in this case, to replace a journalist/columnist.

Did I just say 'good for you' to

Premature to roll this into Microsoft Word? Maybe?

Technology Technology Latest News, Technology Technology Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

CNET Is Reviewing the Accuracy of All Its AI-Written Articles After Multiple Major CorrectionsCNET's writing robot doesn't know what it's talking about. thethoroughbred AI written articles, where are we heading? 'An editor evaluating an AI-generated text cannot assume anything, and instead has to take an exacting, critical eye to every phrase, **world**, and punctuation mark.' This is too funny to me.
Source: Gizmodo - 🏆 556. / 51 Read more »