a $300,000 contribution to international efforts to fight antimicrobial resistance . AMR costs Canada $1.
4-billion every year and is associated with more global deaths than HIV/AIDS, malaria, or breast cancer. Given the scale of the risk, Canada needs to do much more.Enjoy unlimited website access and the digital newspaper.
Let me guess...Western University is top of the funding list? Sounds like fascism!
In other words, emulate China; total gov't control, like the uncontestable power Trudeau tried to entrench at beginning of pandemic. It turns out that with help of his NDP lackeys, he's now got it as long as he wants, without going thru any democratic process
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Technology Technology Latest News, Technology Technology Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
With political will, long-range artillery systems are in Canada’s sightsCanadian production of long-range ballistic artillery and direct-fire systems is within reach if there is political will in Ottawa to do so. The capital investments required are actually relatively small for the strategic capabilities and capacity that can be brought online. Many in Canada seem ill-informed about the industrial capabilities that have been developing right here at home over the past 25-plus years. While a great deal of this industrial capability has been developed to serve the energy sector, nuclear power, and other advanced manufacturing supply chains in civilian applications, this same small and medium-sized enterprise industrial base (largely found in Ontario and Quebec) is already being used to support the United States government with the Canadian Commercial Corporation Act and the Defence Production Sharing Agreement, as well as through U.S. manufacturers. That notwithstanding, the details of this reality seem to evade the radar of many in Canada. A recent Hill Times column suggested that it is not possible in the foreseeable future to produce long-range artillery systems in Canada. This only illustrates that the article’s author does not know what industrial capabilities and capacity exist in Canada to start with, nor are they aware of what is required and how long it will take to close the capability gap from where the Canadian industrial base is today to where it needs to be to produce this type of hardware. Canada is not currently in a position to produce long-range artillery systems without aid from other allies. The fact is this has not been done in Canada since the Korean War. Investments must be made. However, if there is continued political will across allies then partnership with the United States, the United Kingdom, and other nations—including other NATO members—with prime manufacturers who agree to share technical knowledge can make this a reality in a timeframe of 24 months or less. The most immediate and obvious option is the M77
Source: TheHillTimes - 🏆 11. / 79 Read more »