Polkadot Vs. COSMOS Vs. Octopus Network Vs. NEAR Protocol: Fat Hubs Are Better Than Hub Minimalism | HackerNoon

  • 📰 hackernoon
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 40 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 19%
  • Publisher: 51%

Technology Technology Headlines News

Technology Technology Latest News,Technology Technology Headlines

'Polkadot Vs. COSMOS Vs. Octopus Network Vs. NEAR Protocol: Fat Hubs Are Better Than Hub Minimalism' blockchain decentralization

At that time, they had already foreseen that a large number of specific purpose blockchains would continue to appear. It’s only rational to reason that those blockchains would be interconnected into a network.

Therefore, providing that questioned function as a feature of the communication system itself is not possible. The third is to avoid the overlapping of hub and zone functions. Since the hub is the core of the ecosystem, if the hub competes with zones, it will inevitably inhibit the zones’ innovation.In 2020, it was proposed that the Cosmos Hub should have its AMM DEX, as a basic service to serve zones. This proposal obviously violated the principle of Hub Minimalism and unsurprisingly caused fierce controversy.

has always been compared with Cosmos. Although the term is not used, Polkadot also practices Hub Minimalism. How long is left in the current slot lease period of the target parachain? Will the target parachain win the auction again before the slot expires?

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

What is the best power friendly Blockchain? Its Called Libonomy 0.01% power needed check here fast scalable interoperable decentralized autonomous Libonomy blockchain consensus

💞👈

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 532. in TECHNOLOGY

Technology Technology Latest News, Technology Technology Headlines