Facebook removes 8.7m child nudity images

  • 📰 BBCNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 1 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 4%
  • Publisher: 97%

Technology Technology Headlines News

Technology Technology Latest News,Technology Technology Headlines

Facebook removes 8.7m child nudity images in three months

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

But it also wrongly removed a still from 'Close Encounters of the Third Kind', mistaking small, out of focus aliens for naked children.

This is the least they can do after allegedly intentionally exposing users’ data.

Shocking! Why were they ever allowed in the first place?

And that was just from Mark Z’s page 🤔 probably...

pc gone bonkers

About time too!

Children have bodies, they have sexualities, and they all have cameras. Can we please stop this hysteria over pictures of nude children and perhaps focus on sexual fucking torture and mutilation? Thanks

Because cute photo of your kids should only be taken out to embarrass them in private. You just don't do it - plain and simple. 😟 Like photo's in front of schools, street signs and houses. While ya at watch you meta data and location settings. 🥺 Stay Safe Out There 🕵️‍♂️

Jesus H Christ

The world we live in

Wtf how many

Can Facebook of bollox please remove its entire self from the internet many thanks The Norm ✌🏼

Who is putting all these images on there in the first place? Can't they delete them as well.

Our planet should lance the pus-filled boil that is humanity & send us all down the drain. We don't deserve beautiful life-loving children, whom we either pollute directly or by looking the other way. It's past time to make us extinct, & let more decent species take over.

Have they deleted *name deleted for legal reasons* account? DeffoNotCliff NoWay AhAh

Mostly put on by ignorant parents I presume..?!

FB Wie dieses hier, geblockt als “Kinderpornografie“ …ich meine, pervers ist schon, Napalm auf Kinder zu schmeißen – aber so hat man eine Ausrede, die Schande niemandem zu zeigen.

...and now they've finished with Gary Glitter's account, they can move on to the rest of the offenders.

How many years have child nudity images been around on Facebook? Wish they had started cleaning up a little earlier...

Thats 8.7m that shouldn’t have been allowed in the first instance.....wake up to this type of propaganda ! that the likes of FB are doing the right thing all the time !

About damn time!

Why are they even on there? Disgusting

But they keep up pictures and videos of children getting beaten up go figure 🤔

Come on Cleggie, start laying down credit for it already, consummate politician that you are.

8.7 million, and just imagine how many traumatized/victimized kids. :) fucking animals.

that's a very high number of images in just three months... Bit worrying that.

Better late than never, i suppose!

Why did it get in first place ', very poor management. Idiots

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 3. in TECHNOLOGY

Technology Technology Latest News, Technology Technology Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Facebook secret software reveals 8.7m child abuse images on its platformCompany says millions of images removed in a few months with help of machine learning tool This is absurd! Why can’t Facebook ban these images and users from posting these types of images? Half of England weeps. peterdaou What is Facebook going to have to do face any consequences ever? I’ll be the first to say zuckerburg is another trump in the making
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »

Government invests £7m in 'micro-robots' for dangerous work underground and in nuclear facilities'These pipe-repairing robots herald the start of technology that could make that dream a reality in the future,' says science minister Chris Skidmore Micro robots won't need to sign official secrets act. No worries about any Shenanigans then!?!
Source: The Independent - 🏆 80. / 59 Read more »